Aaahh! Why do some people who slather over choice in just about every arena in life think educational choice for parents trapped in bad schools is equivalent to destroying public education??
NYT's article With Vouchers, States Shift Aid for Schools to Families has garnered the regular fascist/marxist comments from the kind of people without children trapped in bad schools. We'll get to that in a second.
But first, one thing about the article that bothers me is the assumption that it's legislators who are redefining education:
A growing number of lawmakers across the country are taking steps to
redefine public education, shifting the debate from the classroom to the
pocketbook...
It's not the states that are redefining public schools; it's the people who have to live and pay taxes to crappy school systems that are redefining education! Again, it's that ignorant implication that the State is the only free actor and people are simply statistical aggregates.
Now for some miscellaneous snippets from a proponent and from a critic quoted in the article:
Mr. Komer at the Institute for Justice called for a shift of focus. “We
happen to take the view that parents know best,” he said, “and are the
best accountability measure to make sure that things are done properly
for their kids.” (I love you.)
“This movement is doing more than threaten the core of our traditional
public school system,” said Timothy Ogle, executive director of the
Arizona School Boards Association. “It’s pushing a national policy
agenda embraced by conservatives across states that are receptive to
conservative ideas.”(Everything he said is true. Now imagine exchanging some words and making this statement about same sex marriage. What a bigot!)
And here are some comments from those who assume they know better than parents actually in the now:
There is no doubt that the ultimate goal for Arizona is the total
destruction of public education in favor of private schools and charter
schools run by corporations. (Yeah, free of doubt like a Stalinist show trial.)
My biggest beef with all of these voucher programs is that they lead to
re-segregation of the educational system. Not just by race, but by
class, religious, social and intellectual proclivities. (Otherwise, our public schools are so racially, socially, and economically well integrated. Let me guess, you're from Vermont.)
Currently, many middle class and poor families are not well enough
informed to know that they might soon lose one of the benefits that has
been granted to American families for a long time. (By ill-informed you mean not passive enough to accept things as they are?)
In my humble opinion, many parents of the neediest (educationally and
income-wise) kids have absolutely no clue about what's good for their
children. (Go look up humble in the dictionary.)
Conservatives have been trying to destroy public education for decades.(Public education is destroying public education.)
This is all part of the GOP's plan to destroy public education and support church schools. Typically these programs have NO accountability...(Umm, these programs are accountable to the parents and students, genius.)
To be fair, and to be pleasantly surprised, many readers of the article defended the right of parents to guide their own children's educations, to include providing vouchers. Imagine! Our very own tax money being given back to us to use as we think best! God, this must strike fear into the hearts of reactionaries everywhere! I'm all warmed inside to see so many people finally coming around to understanding public education has to be freed from its Medieval guild structure if it is to ever evolve.
Post Update: I take it back. The comment section is now awash with spittle spewing stooges. Yes, the face of public education.
What is Freedom?
What is freedom? Is it the freedom to do whatever we want without government interference? Is it the freedom to shape our political or social culture through group action? Does it mean a well-ordered society that allows us to make long range plans without the chaos of shifting rules and new paradigms? Maybe it's freedom from anarchy and the inevitable rule of the strongest. Security is a freedom of sorts. Not worrying about whether or not one will be able to feed one's children is a freedom. It's a freedom from fear and despair. How free does one feel who can't get medical help for a sick child?
There's a freedom that comes with money. Would you rather be rich in a less free country or poor in a freer one? I'm not sure which I'd pick -- personal freedom or my ideals. And there's the freedom that comes with living far away from the bureaucrats. But that has less to do with principle than environment. We can't recreate our Wild West, and most people wouldn't choose to live in the wilds of Alaska only to be able to drink raw milk and ride helmet-less.
I recently had a long conversation with someone who feels our freedoms as Americans are being lost; that America is becoming a tyranny. And he wants to move to another country where he can be more free. But I could never get him to tell me what he means by freedom. I think he means his own personal freedom to live without petty rules and regulations.
Personally, I think most of the petty rules and regulations growing around us come more from busybody people than from any governmental plan to enslave and control us. Neighborhoods pass ordinances in an attempt to keep resale values high. Pools lose diving boards because parents sued when a child broke his neck. Helmets become mandatory because we hate the idea of someone unnecessarily risking his life. We have to fight creeping legalism by not turning to government to regulate behavior and risks we ourselves don't like and by accepting the consequences of our stupid choices.
Businesses also want to protect themselves, and they turn to government to slow down upstarts and eliminate competition. And people in these industries usually go right along with anything that helps them. How many of us manage to be objective when it comes to our own paychecks and benefits?
My friend is betting against the U.S. He's willing to put his resources and energy into another country he thinks will allow him to be more free. He thinks he'll find people who love personal liberty more somewhere else. I don't know. If, today, you had to place a chip representing your life savings and future earnings on either the square where the U.S. will remain a first class country with an imperfect but sure emphasis on personal liberty or on the square where our country becomes a failed state that turns to rounding up old people and raiding their bank accounts, I think you'd be a fool to bet so much on the latter.
The freedom to nap.
Posted at 07:54 PM in Adorable Animal Pictures, Photos, Thoughtful Commentary | Permalink | Comments (0)
| Reblog (0)