I've been thinking lately about swimming vocabulary, thanks to a post by Evan. It all started out with his discussion of the term to get chicked. I have a long history with this term, starting at a very young age when my Italian mom would throw shoes at me. It doesn't matter how fast you can run if your mom can knock you out with her pumps.
Most memorably, at least for me, was in 1985, when I attempted (and finished!) my first and last Olympic distance triathlon. Of course, it 1985 they weren't called that yet. They were simply standard distance triathlons; 1.5K swim, 40K bike and 10K run.
I didn't know much about training for these things. I would never train right. In fact, my first 10K at the ripe age of 15 was the result of running a mile a day for a couple of months prior. Granted, I had a great first mile, 5:25, followed by an 11:00 second mile. (My father warned me against standing at the front of the pack at the start line. What the hell did he know?, I thought. Well, another instance of Father Knows Best.) My final time was just over one hour. But still I didn't learn. I started training for my triathlon as if the run part were just a 10K (I held then, and still believe, that one should train for that triathlon 10K as if it were a stand-alone 20K).
My 1985 triathlon started out alright. I came out of the water fast and transitioned to the bike quickly. I had the numbers of the other five guys from my age group (19 and under) on my arm, and at the half-way mark on the bike, I passed a guy and realized his number was on my arm. In the end, I made up 12 minutes on him on the second half of the bike.
But the run killed me. And this was where I met Ruth. The first 5K of the run hurt like nothing I could imagine. My thighs were on fire, and I had to stop every few 100m to squat down. That felt great, but then I had to get on my hands and knees and get to vertical like a drunk. I could then run another couple hundred meters before the cycle restarted. Ruth caught up with me at the half-way mark. She was very sweet, and made me look around and reflect on what a beautiful morning it was. And it was. She was absolutely right. I ran with her for about a mile, but then she asked if I was going to do this tri next year, and my thighs started to remind me of the pain. I begged her pardon, told her I'd see her at the end of the race, and did the squat-thing again.
And there she was, at the finish, somehow in the company of my father and sister (how do grandmas do that?), cheering me in. She clapped me on the back, told me congrats, and then ran off. RAN OFF! A week later I learned that she had won her age group, 60-64. (I ended up 3/6, and the guy I passed on the bike made up 9 minutes on me to come in 4th.)
Again, this never affected me like it does some guys. After all, with a mom like mine and two sisters, I knew early that women could do anything they wanted. And in some instances, better than men. So today I thought: In what sports can men and women compete head-to-head?
Iditarod came to mind, as does NASCAR. Yachting also, I think. But I couldn't come up with any more. Until I read Evan's post today. Once marathon swimming gets beyond a certain distance, the advantage men have over (most) women is lost. Shelley Taylor-Smith still holds the world record for swimming around Manhattan. She did all 28.5 miles in 5:45.25. That record has not altered since she swam in 1995. Two of the world's fastest and strongest marathon swimmers, who both happen to be men, attempted to beat her record last year, but alas, they were not fast enough.
So perhaps marathon swimming can be added to the list of sports in which men and women can compete equally!