What I find a bit disconcerting is that President Obama's position on Libya reflects my own muddy position. I too don't have a strong position. I do not know enough about the region or potential future consequences to have a strong opinion, hence, I am inarticulate on the subject. Instead, based on whatever well argued position I last heard, my opinion swings between a desire to not become entangled in yet another Middle Eastern country and the fear that we will miss an opportunity to take out a brutal dictator who will now crush the fledgling democratic uprising.
I think President Obama is in this same position. He doesn't seem to have a coherent philosophical basis from which to judge this situation and to act accordingly. This explains his reliance on the international community's collective decision to institute the no-fly zone. He certainly had an unshakable opinion when it came to the war in Iraq. What has changed? I don't understand why he didn't just stand by his earlier belief in no war for oil, or no war without Congress or UN approval, etc. As I earlier wrote I suspect that the way to Obama's approval is through pressure from those he considers his philosophical and intellectual equals -- the United Nations crowd.
Det forutsettes at slik sponsing er ikke bare uten presedens i den kinesiske fotball, sjelden sett i europeisk fotball. Kontrakt ned hele ligaen er faktisk sjelden.
Posted by: Nike Free Run Norge | 09/14/2012 at 03:30 AM