What to think about the whole Libyan thing...Again, like the Iraq and Afghanistan decisions to send in forces, I reluctantly think there are no right decisions - just better and worse decisions. But, good decisions today can lead to bad consequences in the future, and vice versa. Will we spend our treasure pursuing ideological, national, international, or humanitarian interests?
In Obama's case, international cooperation seems to have been the decisive factor for him. Perhaps he thinks groups are better able to make morally fraught choices. Or maybe he's come to the conclusion that presumed guilt is better shared. I think he can't help but be part of the international "moral majority". They are his peers. Moral considerations play no less a role in the Obama administration than they did in the Bush administration. His decision just has more to do with supporting peer-group sanctioned action.
I can find just enough morally resonating meat in the arguments for supporting the rebels against Qaddafi to be a weak supporter of our involvement. I'd rather we hadn't gone in. We already have obligations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Although I'm quite happy with Obama keeping, or at least claiming, America's role as one of support rather than one of leadership.
I wonder if all those hate-spewing Bush bashers will come after Obama with the same enthusiasm. A few consistent-to-a-fault types will. The rest will adjust -- one can always protest the super genius republicans and their billionaire supporters planning to destroy and/or brainwash the middle class by going after public employee unions.
Det samme tid, i de neste 10 årene, sponsing avgift vil være den årlige rate på 10% økning hvert år. Som et resultat, vil Nike sponsing totale kostnadene på mer enn 200 millioner amerikanske dollar.
Posted by: Nike Free 3.0 Norge | 09/14/2012 at 03:30 AM